01

Design the tenure and the building together

The cooperative holds the building collectively; members have individual rights of use. The homes cannot simply be sold or rented out by their occupants as private assets. The cooperative’s general assembly is central to decisions.

Architects Lacol developed the project with residents, combining homes with shared facilities on leased public land. Laundry, guest and communal spaces change what each household needs to provide privately. The ownership arrangement and the physical plan therefore support each other.

02

Ask what the shared model requires

Our reading: a housing project can innovate in the relationship between a resident and a home, not only in the way the building is constructed. Keeping the asset collective changes the decisions available to an individual member and the work members must do together.

That makes governance part of the housing experience. Initial contributions, monthly payments, exit rules and the time required for collective decisions all matter when comparing this model with renting or buying. Shared ownership alone is not proof of affordability in another place.

WHAT THE SOURCES SHOW

Completed project · Completed 2018

28 homes with shared everyday spaces

Lacol documents a completed cooperative building with 28 dwellings and shared facilities, including a kitchen, laundry and guest space.

What this tells us. Completion demonstrates the model in one building. Affordability elsewhere depends on land access, finance, governance and local conditions.

Lacol · La Borda project recordSource checked
Sources (3)
  1. Lacol · 2018 building, 28 homes, shared facilities and participatory design
  2. La Borda cooperative · Collective ownership, individual use and restrictions on selling or renting the dwelling
  3. La Borda cooperative · 2015 public-land lease, duration and regulated housing conditions
Have a correction or useful update? Let us know ↗